Sgwrs Defnyddiwr:Deb
Ychwanegu adranArchifau |
2007 - 2018 |
My Welsh is not really up to any complicated discussion, so if anyone wants to talk to me here, please put your comments in both languages. Thanks. Deb 21:19 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- Helo Deb! Croeso i'r Wicipedia Cymraeg -- peidiwch a phoeni os ydych chi ddim yn ysgrifennu Gymraeg perffaith, mae'r mwyafrif ohonom ni yn yr un cwch! Mae'n braf i gweld chi yma.
- Hello Deb! Welcome to the Welsh Wikipedia -- don't worry if you don't write perfect Welsh, most of us are in the same boat! It's nice to see you over here. I've been playing around with the Welsh [localisation file] -- do you feel able to take a look to see if what I've done so far makes sense (rather a lot of it has come out of a few dictionaries, as we seem to be a bit lacking in technical terminology though I have found a list I've put up at Termau cyfrifiadurol Cymraeg!). -- Arwel 22:00 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Hi Deb! Welcome back, I hadn't noticed you around here for a while and was hoping you were OK. -- Arwel 01:11, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Gwerthfawrogiad!
[golygu cod]| Gwerthfawrogiad o'th Waith Arbennig! | ||||
| Carwn gyflwyno'r seren hon i ti, Deb annwyl, fel gwerthfawrogiad o'th waith arbennig, a diflino, dydd ar ôl dydd ar ôl dydd! Cyflwyniad personol ydy hwn, ond gwn hefyd fod dy waith yn cael ei werthfawrogi gan y gymuned a'r darllenwyr! Diolch! Llywelyn2000 (sgwrs) 13:29, 28 Mawrth 2019 (UTC) |
- Bore da Deb! Good morning Deb!
Regarding the account which has been blocked - 212.219.245.10. I work with schools and this is a school IP address. I was wondering if it was possible to unblock this address? It covers a lot of schools on the Island of Anglesey and I will be doing a bit of work with one of the schools this morning. Hope this is possible. Prosiect Wici Môn (sgwrs)
- Diolch Deb!Prosiect Wici Môn (sgwrs)
Dearest Deb, how are you? Diolch for the help in this page!!!
Rei Momo (sgwrs) 05:34, 13 Awst 2019 (UTC)
- Buongiorno! Deb (sgwrs) 07:17, 13 Awst 2019 (UTC)
Sgwrs:Tony Britton
[golygu cod]Re: Sgwrs:Tony Britton. Would 2 or 3 sentence articles be excepted on the English language Wikipedia? 85.254.72.28 08:25, 27 Rhagfyr 2019 (UTC)
- Of course! There are no grounds for deleting this stub. On English wikipedia it would be tagged for expansion and improvement. If we deleted every stub on Welsh Wikipedia, there wouldn't be much left! Deb (sgwrs) 09:29, 27 Rhagfyr 2019 (UTC)
- Can you link to a 2 sentence article published in the last few weeks on English Wikipedia, please? 85.254.72.26 19:24, 27 Rhagfyr 2019 (UTC)
- Here are two: [1] and [2] Deb (sgwrs) 21:38, 27 Rhagfyr 2019 (UTC)
- No! The first was written 31 August 2007 and the second has 6 sentences not 2, as produced by you. Try and create a 2 sentence article on the English Wikipedia, today, and it won't last long!!! 2A00:23C6:990E:A600:39FC:F50F:D440:D567 11:15, 1 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- You're completely incorrect and I'm not wasting any more time on this discussion. Deb (sgwrs) 12:18, 1 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- en:Fred Emmer, en:John Simonian, en:Jan de Laval, en:Jagdev Singh Rai, en:Sajjad Ganjzadeh, en:Oswaldo_Larriva, en:Herbert Binkert, en:Michel Celaya
- No! The first was written 31 August 2007 and the second has 6 sentences not 2, as produced by you. Try and create a 2 sentence article on the English Wikipedia, today, and it won't last long!!! 2A00:23C6:990E:A600:39FC:F50F:D440:D567 11:15, 1 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- Here are two: [1] and [2] Deb (sgwrs) 21:38, 27 Rhagfyr 2019 (UTC)
- You're right Deb, there are 2-sentence 'articles' on enwiki. However, that does NOT mean that we should follow that low standard. Indeed we have long accepted that the absolute minimum should be:
- 2 paragraphs
- a WD Infobox
- categories
- at least 2 references.
- Any 'articles' not conforming to this should be tagged with a deletion template on cywiki. Or do you suggest we lower these standards?
- Llywelyn2000 (sgwrs) 14:10, 22 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- No, I just think time must be allowed for improvements to be made, and that's what happens on the English Wikipedia (where they have far more problems with unfinished articles than we do). Deb (sgwrs) 14:13, 22 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- You're right Deb, there are 2-sentence 'articles' on enwiki. However, that does NOT mean that we should follow that low standard. Indeed we have long accepted that the absolute minimum should be:
Happy New Year !!!
[golygu cod]Sorry the delay, but untill Jan. 31st it's time to wish, :-)!!!
Rei Momo (sgwrs) 22:00, 10 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
The Church of Almighty God ("Yr Eglwys Dduw Hollalluog" in Welsh?)
[golygu cod]In case you were wondering about the phrase "Yr Eglwys Dduw Hollalluog", it was my guess at the phrase "The Church of Almighty God" (which is the official English translation of the original Chinese name: 全能神教會 / Quánnéng-Shén-Jiàohuì).
Here's one article for starters: https://bitterwinter.org/what-is-the-church-of-almighty-god/
As for my guess for a Welsh translation of the new religious movement's name, do you think it's good as is? Or, does it need an improvement or two?
I hope the post clears things up benevolently. --Lo Ximiendo (sgwrs) 10:43, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Lo Ximiendo. I wasn't wondering. I checked out the article on the English Wikipedia and found that the figures you had added were inaccurate. The translation seems fine though. Deb (sgwrs) 12:43, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- Where could the new religious movement be mentioned? --Lo Ximiendo (sgwrs) 13:04, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- You are free to start an article on it any time you like - but it must be in Welsh and have proper references. Deb (sgwrs) 13:08, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- Very well, I'll make a subpage on my user page. --Lo Ximiendo (sgwrs) 13:32, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- Fancy a look? --Lo Ximiendo (sgwrs) 14:55, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- I've already seen the English page, thanks. I'll have a look when you've produced something in Welsh. It's not likely anyone else on the project will have time to translate the whole thing for you. Deb (sgwrs) 15:06, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
- The English version I'm displaying is completely different than the current version. --Lo Ximiendo (sgwrs) 23:06, 23 Ionawr 2020 (UTC)
Hi, dearest Deb, how are you? Me I'm very fine!
I've opened this short page, and please, I ask 3 minutes of your time to correct the mistakes that there are in biography, taken form English page. Thanks a lot for your important help. See you soon.
Rei Momo (sgwrs) 10:05, 29 Chwefror 2020 (UTC)
- Diolch, and have a nice day!!! Rei Momo (sgwrs) 10:44, 29 Chwefror 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I ask you, Dafyddt or any other administrator to please the delete the linked page. That is a cross-wiki spam issue, and this is the only wiki which hasn't deleted it. It should be deleted here so we can delete it on Wikidata. Thank you, --Esteban16 (sgwrs) 17:37, 25 Mai 2020 (UTC)
- Esteban16, I suspected as much and have done as you asked. Deb (sgwrs) 18:55, 25 Mai 2020 (UTC)
Universal Code of Conduct
[golygu cod]Hi Deb
I was asked by Wikimedia Foundation to promote this call for participation on the planned Universal Code of Conduct.
Best regards --Holder (sgwrs) 04:35, 14 Awst 2020 (UTC)
At times, our contributor communities and projects have suffered from a lack of guidelines that can help us together create an environment where free knowledge can be shared safely without fear.
There has been talk about the need for a global set of conduct rules in different communities over time. Recently, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees announced a Community Culture Statement, asking for new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects. [3]
The universal code of conduct will be a binding minimum set of standards across all Wikimedia projects, and will apply to all of us, staff and volunteers alike, all around the globe.. It is of great importance that we all participate in expressing our opinions and thoughts about UCoC and its values. We should think about what we want it to cover or include and what it shouldn’t include, and how it may create difficulties or help our groups.
This is the time to talk about it. Before starting drafting the code of conduct, we would like to hear from you and to solicit the opinions and feedback of your colleagues.
In order for your voice to be heard, we encourage and invite you to read more about the universal code of conduct (UCoC) [4] and then write down your opinions or feedback on the discussion page [5]. To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcomed to translate the universal code of conduct english main page into your respective local language [6]. You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.
How we will see unregistered users
[golygu cod]Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:11, 4 Ionawr 2022 (UTC)
Diolch am gyfieithu'r dyddiadau yn y cyfeiriadau ayb
[golygu cod]Deb - diolch am dy waith yn fama! Pan ga i 5 munud, mi wna i trawlio / cynaeafu pob dyddiad tebyg, gyda AWB, a'i gyfieithu'n otomatig. Llai o waith! Blwyddyn Newydd Gwell / Bendigedig i ti hefyd! Cofion cynnes... Llywelyn2000 (sgwrs) 17:46, 14 Ionawr 2022 (UTC)
Dim problem! Dw i'n gwneud fy ngorau... Deb (sgwrs) 18:04, 14 Ionawr 2022 (UTC)
Stefania Turkewich
[golygu cod]Hello Deb, Thank you for your message today! When you have the time, can you take a look at the English article: en: Stefania Turkewich? Stefania was the first woman composer of classical music in Ukraine. Could you give the article a start in the Welsh language Wikipedia with an introductory sentence or paragraph for the Wikipedia CEE Spring 2022 project? Nicola Mitchell (sgwrs) 12:00, 9 Ebrill 2022 (UTC)
Nicola Mitchell, Okay, but please understand I can only manage the basics. Deb (sgwrs) 13:01, 9 Ebrill 2022 (UTC)
- That's all that's needed for an introduction. Thanks for this! Nicola Mitchell (sgwrs) 13:22, 9 Ebrill 2022 (UTC)
- I just saw it. It looks great! Thank you! Nicola Mitchell (sgwrs) 13:25, 9 Ebrill 2022 (UTC)
Ethol Alwyn ar Wicidestun
[golygu cod]Haia Deb. Dyma'r dolen roeddet ti'n chwilio amdano! 5 enw sydd ei angen. Diolch! 86.178.153.220 11:52, 29 Ebrill 2022 (UTC)
cwestiwn pwysig
[golygu cod]Helo cariad Deb.... Beth yw caniatadau defnyddwyr yn y Wicipedia Cymraeg? --Osps7 (sgwrs) 13:35, 3 Tachwedd 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the important aid in this page!!! See you soon Rei Momo (sgwrs) 22:48, 15 Tachwedd 2022 (UTC)
Jawa/Jafa/Java
[golygu cod]Mae gennym gategori "Jawa" eisoes, sy'n dod o dan "Ynysyoedd Indonesia" yn "Daearyddiaeth Indonesia". "Jawa" yw'r ffurf yn Atlas Cymraeg Newydd. Rwyf wedi symud "Daeargryn Gorllewin Java 2022" i Daeargryn Gorllewin Jawa 2022, ac wedi gwneud newidiau eraill yn yr erthygl. 'Sdim angen am gategori newydd "Java", felly. Hwyl, Dafydd Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 13:54, 30 Tachwedd 2022 (UTC)
promotional articles
[golygu cod]Hi, can you please delete this article. It is promotional, and not notable. Thanks.-- فيصل (sgwrs) 21:21, 22 Mawrth 2023 (UTC)
Annwyl Deb oes gennych ddiddordeb, ymunwch gyda WiciBrosiect Cymru os gwelwch yn dda! Byddai eich profiad yno yn werthfawr tu hwnt. Diolch yn fawr
Dear Deb, If you're interested, please join WiciBrosiect Cymru. Your experience there would be greatly appraciated. Thanks very much Titus Gold (sgwrs) 15:24, 29 Ebrill 2023 (UTC)
Tumbuka Arch
[golygu cod]Rwyf newydd gael neges gan Tumbuka Arch, pwy wnest ti ei flocio. Rwy'n meddwl bod yn rhaid dy fod wedi clicio ar yr enw anghywir ar ddamwain. Nid ef oedd yn gyfrifol am y sbam; doedd e ddim ond yn gwneud adroddiad arno. Hwyl! Dafydd -- Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 10:28, 28 Mehefin 2023 (UTC)
- (yn nes ymlaen) Sori, Deb. Dydw i ddim yn hoffi ymyrryd, ond mae'n amlwg ei fod yn dal i boeni am y peth, felly rydw i wedi ei ddadflocio. --Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 14:54, 28 Mehefin 2023 (UTC)
- Diolch. Deb (sgwrs) 15:48, 28 Mehefin 2023 (UTC)
Spam article
[golygu cod]Apologies for writing in English. Can you please delete Forex Regulatory? Count Count (sgwrs) 15:50, 30 Gorffennaf 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Deb (sgwrs) 15:56, 30 Gorffennaf 2023 (UTC)
A wnewch chi ddefnyddio'r nodyn hon: {{WiciBrosiect Cymru}}
ar dudalen sgwrs pob erthygl sy'n ymwneud â Chymru a'r Cymry os gwelwch yn dda?
Diolch! Titus Gold (sgwrs) 22:25, 20 Hydref 2023 (UTC)
- Ychwanegwch gategorïau at eich erthyglau, os gwelwch chi'n dda. Maen nhw'n bwysig. Deb (sgwrs) 08:57, 12 Rhagfyr 2023 (UTC)
Remnants of cross-wiki spam
[golygu cod]Hi! It seems that the article Poor Innocence in cy.wiki is the last remnants of promotional cross-wiki spam and as such is a subject for deletion. The best, Андрей Романенко (sgwrs) 23:08, 15 Rhagfyr 2023 (UTC)
- Diolch! Deb (sgwrs) 09:27, 28 Rhagfyr 2023 (UTC)
Help with an article
[golygu cod]Hi, how are you? I am sorry for bothering you but I would like to ask you whether you could please help me revising this article? I am not a native speaker of Welsh and I am not sure whether there are any errors there so I wouldn't like to continue if the article is wrong. Could you please help me? --Jon Gua (sgwrs) 07:28, 25 Ebrill 2024 (UTC)
- Croeso. I'll try, but my Welsh is not advanced. Deb (sgwrs) 08:16, 25 Ebrill 2024 (UTC)
Categori:Aelodau Seneddol y Deyrnas Unedig ar gyfer etholaethau Cymreig
[golygu cod]Shwmae Deb, I'm thinking that "ar gyfer" doesn't look quite right for Categori:Aelodau Seneddol y Deyrnas Unedig ar gyfer etholaethau Cymreig - "dros" seems to be the common way of linking aelodau seneddol and their seats, fel "Aelodau Seneddol y Deyrnas Unedig dros etholaethau Cymreig". Beth wy ti'n meddwl? Sionk (sgwrs) 15:08, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Dw i'n siwr bod ti'n gywir, ond nid oedd fy syniad. Dros? Deb (sgwrs) 15:14, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Ron i'n meddwl, os ti'n cytuno gyda'r awgrymiad, basai gwell i ti (fel creawdwr gwreiddiol) i wneud y newid...? Sionk (sgwrs) 18:47, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Oes tudalennau eraill fel 'na? Deb (sgwrs) 19:01, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Wel, nawr rydw i'n edrych yn agosach, mae lot o 'cookie cutter' erthyglau'n bodoli am etholaethau Cymreig s'yn dweud "Yr aelod presennol dros yr etholaeth yw..." e.e. Gorllewin Abertawe (etholaeth Senedd Cymru). Mae lot of erthyglau am aelodau seneddol hefyd s'yn defnyddio "dros" e.e. David T. C. Davies. Sionk (sgwrs) 19:56, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Oes tudalennau eraill fel 'na? Deb (sgwrs) 19:01, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
- Ron i'n meddwl, os ti'n cytuno gyda'r awgrymiad, basai gwell i ti (fel creawdwr gwreiddiol) i wneud y newid...? Sionk (sgwrs) 18:47, 19 Gorffennaf 2024 (UTC)
Translation request
[golygu cod]Hello, Deb.
Can you translate and upload the article about the prominent Turkish economist en:Dani Rodrik in Welsh Wikipedia?
Yours sincerely, Oirattas (sgwrs) 13:39, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- I'd need a good reason. Deb (sgwrs) 13:44, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- He is a prominent economist in his field. Economists are not celebritites and thus are not famous. Oirattas (sgwrs) 13:46, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- I see that the English article still has improvement tags on it. I think those need to be addressed before we add him here. Bear in mind that I'm not fluent, and any article I might create would be a short one. Deb (sgwrs) 13:54, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- I understand. Thank you for the reply. Oirattas (sgwrs) 13:55, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- I see that the English article still has improvement tags on it. I think those need to be addressed before we add him here. Bear in mind that I'm not fluent, and any article I might create would be a short one. Deb (sgwrs) 13:54, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
- He is a prominent economist in his field. Economists are not celebritites and thus are not famous. Oirattas (sgwrs) 13:46, 18 Hydref 2024 (UTC)
Dileu hawliau 5 Gweinyddwr
[golygu cod]Haia Deb!
Os gweli di'n dda a wnei di fwrw golwg dros y dualen Sgwrs Wicipedia:Gweinyddwyr. Mae 5 Gweinyddwr sydd heb olygu ers dros 12 mis. Os wyt ti'n cytuno tynnu eu galluoedd, tybed a wnei di adael neges ar y dudalen Sgwrs yma? Ar ol 7 diwrnod mi wna i gais am Removal of access ar Meta. Efallai y gwnei roi dy fod yn Fiwrocrat hefyd os gweli di'n dda. Cofion cynnes, Robin. Llywelyn2000 (sgwrs) 12:47, 10 Chwefror 2025 (UTC)
Giovanni Losi
[golygu cod]Dearest Deb, diolch for your help!!! See you soon. Rei Momo (sgwrs) 07:58, 13 Chwefror 2025 (UTC)
- I had to delete your latest article because it was about Carlo Borromeo but had a different title. I'm not sure what you were trying to do. I can restore the content if necessary, but not to that title. Deb (sgwrs) 08:26, 13 Chwefror 2025 (UTC)
Enwau brenhinoedd
[golygu cod]Heia Deb! Rwyt ti wedi gwrthdroi fy ngolygiadau ar 25 Tachwedd. Mae ein polisi erbyn hyn o ran enwau brenhinoedd yw dilyn John Davies a defnyddio'r ffurfiau Saesneg. Gweler Wicipedia:Arddull#Termau amgen. Wnes i ddim cymryd rhan yn y drafodaeth yn y Caffi, gyda llaw. Rwy'n agnostig am faterion o'r fath, ond fel hen olygydd blinedig, rwy'n hoffi gweld cysondeb, a hynny oedd beth oeddwn i'n ei wneud yn yr achos yma a sawl un arall, wrth imi newid "Iago" yn "James". Dydw i ddim yn gweld rhesym pam y dylai 25 Tachwedd fod yn eithriad. Hwyl, Dafydd Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 11:35, 11 Mawrth 2025 (UTC)
- Nid oeddwn yn gwybod am y newid polisi hwn. Yn anffodus alla i ddim yn wneud unrhyw beth amdano nawr. Deb (sgwrs) 13:26, 11 Mawrth 2025 (UTC)
Spam Article
[golygu cod]Hello, can you take a look at Shamim Hossen? It's created by a cross-wiki spammer for spam purpose, the delete tag was reverted by the spammer and most of the page from other languages wikipedia has been deleted. Many thanks. Aqurs1 (sgwrs) 15:09, 3 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I thought so. I'll get rid of it. Deb (sgwrs) 15:40, 3 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
Leverkusen
[golygu cod]Heia Deb! Sylwais dy fod wedi dileu'r erthygl "Leverkusen", a grëwyd yr wythnos diwethaf. Mae hyn yn ymddangos braidd yn llym! Roedd yn fyr iawn, ond yn cynnwys gwybodaeth ddefnyddiol. Gwn eich bod wedi'i marcio gyda'r arwydd "Dim ffynhonnellau" ond mae hynny'n sicr yn bechod bychan. Dydw i ddim yn siŵr pa ffynhonnell, y tu hwnt i'r Wikidata yr oedd yn seiliedig arni, fyddai'n ddefnyddiol. Hwyl, Dafydd Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 09:57, 10 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Rwy'n deall eich pwynt. Fodd bynnag, flynyddoedd yn ôl, penderfynwyd trwy gonsensws bod rhaid i bob erthygl ar y wicipedia hwn gynnwys o leiaf un ffynhonnell. (Nid oeddwn yn rhan o'r drafodaeth hon, ond dyna a benderfynwyd.) Mae Defnyddiwr:Lloyd Jones Cymru wedi cael rhybudd am hyn, ond nid yw'n ymddangos ei fod yn gwrando. Ar Wicipedia Saesneg, os na ellir dod o hyd i ffynonellau, gellid dileu'r erthygl ar unwaith. (Ymddiheuriadau os yw fy Nghymraeg yn anghywir.) Deb (sgwrs) 12:22, 10 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Mae'n ddrwg gen i. Byddaf yn ceisio ychwanegu ffynonellau'r tro nesaf. Rydw i wedi bod yn anghofio oherwydd fy mod i'n brysur a materion personol y tu allan i Wicipedia. Lloyd Jones Cymru (sgwrs) 21:35, 10 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i'n hapus gyda'r fersiwn newydd! Deb (sgwrs) 07:48, 11 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Canlyniad da! Diolch, Deb a LJC. --Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 15:03, 11 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Mae'n ddrwg gen i. Byddaf yn ceisio ychwanegu ffynonellau'r tro nesaf. Rydw i wedi bod yn anghofio oherwydd fy mod i'n brysur a materion personol y tu allan i Wicipedia. Lloyd Jones Cymru (sgwrs) 21:35, 10 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
Blaen-y-coed
[golygu cod]Beth sy'n digwydd 'ma? Nes i sylwi ar y newid i Blaen-y-coed gynnau fach, a meddwl ei fod yn gwneud yn union yr hyn oedd yn iawn, gan mai dyn oedd Howell Elvet Lewis, felly "ei blentyndod" yn hytrach nag "ei phlentyndod". Mae "ei pregeth" yn ffurff amhosibl – rhaid bod treiglad; felly "ei bregeth". Rwy'n credu bod "mewn llofft stabl" ac "yn llofft stabl" yn gywir, er bod "mewn" yn well yma yn ôl pob tebyg. Ond rwyt ti wedi gwrthdroi'r newidiadau hyn, sy'n drueni. Ces i fy synnu o weld mai Cwmcafit (un sy'n ddibynadwy iawn fel arfer) a gyflwynodd y paragraff diofal hwn yn y lle cyntaf, ac efallai mai dyna wnest ti sylwi hefyd. Ond mae arna i ofn mai ein cyfrannwr dienw sydd gywir yma, o ran gramadeg.
Gyda llaw, dw i newydd ddechrau Goresgyniad Normanaidd Lloegr. (Nes i roi'r gorau i obeithio y byddai rhywun mwy cymwys yn ei wneud.) Wyt ti'n gwybod am lyfrau addas i fod yn ffynhonnell gyfeirio ar gyfer hyn? Hwyl, Dafydd Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 22:40, 14 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Diolch. Mae arnaf ofn i mi wneud y newid o fy anwybodaeth fy hun. Deb (sgwrs) 11:51, 15 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i'n awgrymu R R Davies https://www.amazon.co.uk/Age-Conquest-1063-1415-R-Davies/dp/0198201982/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2N8IH3H5SX4Z8&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.txwLSUmSi5WUNeSiTM0XLi-phUglUt2isQvoInbPriY3qD-xWSrAdbAY-j2DQfmBLpydnHzBNdO3YD9a5ZC4V4lBZajH4JGrO4jHLDEQQOjSxw4zSzPQ7hFCOTX-hsanxr6aoAOgwT-_pIs308nzQ8LsMWP8IVpcPVjRWAGuQVxH26hdMc2zjsSUBKJ8rDjOqnMFfebcrsnWANH0TnkoHV2Y6g78Xe4YjSAORlaG7S4.5EHJAdZwMvI-se_ssYa13DDfUHV7D5LZ5vamroSy84M&dib_tag=se&keywords=age+of+conquest+wales&qid=1749988486&s=books&sprefix=age+of+conquest+wales%2Cstripbooks%2C152&sr=1-1
- Dw i ddim yn gwybod unrhywbeth yn well. Deb (sgwrs) 11:56, 15 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
- Diolch am hynny i gyd, Deb! Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 14:32, 15 Mehefin 2025 (UTC)
Nancy Williams
[golygu cod]Shwmae, Deb. Gobeithio does dim ots gyda ti, ond jest eisiau egluro fy ngolygiad i'r erthygl, rhag ofn dy fod ti'n meddwl beth oedd yn bod arni.
Does dim cyfieithiad uniongyrchol i "made her name" yn y Gymraeg. Mae "she made a name for herself" / "gwnaeth enw iddi hi ei hun" yn iawn, ond es i am "daeth yn adnabyddus" (she became well known).
Wyt ti wedi bod i wersi Cymraeg ffurfiol? If so, I imagine the patterns taught would be 'Gwnaeth hi... ' (affirmative) / 'Wnaeth hi...?' (question) / 'Wnaeth hi ddim....' (negative). So only soft mutate questions and the negative. Ar y llaw arall....if you've been studying more formal Welsh, you may wellhave seen a soft mutation in all cases, but a proceeding connecting word is necessary 'Fe/Mi wnaeth hi' (affirmative) / 'A wnaeth hi?' (question) / 'Ni wnaeth hi' (negative). 'Gwnaeth hi symud' would be okay, but 'Symudodd hi/Nancy' (conjugating the verb) is more natural, but I dropped the pronoun/name as it's not always necessary. Rhyswynne (sgwrs) 12:37, 4 Gorffennaf 2025 (UTC)
- Diolch yn fawr iawn! Deb (sgwrs) 12:39, 4 Gorffennaf 2025 (UTC)
Ffynonellau
[golygu cod]O ran HomoloGene: "Nid yw'r erthygl hon yn dyfynnu unrhyw ffynonellau." Beth wyt ti'n ei ddysgwyl? Ychydig iawn sydd i'w ddweud am y fenter. Mae popeth sydd angen ei ddweud yn ymddangos yn "Dolenni allanol". Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 09:29, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Mae cyfeiriadau yn hanfodol. Rydym wedi trafod hyn o'r blaen? Mae dolenni allanol yn beth gwahanol. Deb (sgwrs) 11:30, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Peidiwch â saethu'r negesydd os gwelwch yn dda! Deb (sgwrs) 11:36, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i'n credu bod angen hyblygrwydd arnom ni yn hyn o beth. Dim ond oherwydd bod bron i 3,000 o ddolenni coch wedi'u gwasgaru drwy'r tudalennau y creais yr erthygl hon. Dw i'n treulio oriau bob dydd yn ceisio trwsio pethau fel hyn – problemau na wnes i eu creu. A dweud y gwir, dw i'n gweld y faner "dim fynonellau" yn ymosodol. Dw i'n teimlo bod mynnu ffynonellau ar gyfer erthygl syml fel hon fel gofyn am dapiau aur mewn bwthyn heb ddŵr prif gyflenwad. Hwyl, Dafydd. Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 11:45, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Gadewch i mi egluro ymhellach. Rhaid adolygu'r erthyglau newydd ("Marcio bod y tudalen wedi derbyn ymweliad patrol!) cyn iddyn nhw fynd yn y templed "Erthyglau Newydd". Dydw i ddim yn teimlo y gallaf eu marcio fel rhai wedi'u hadolygu heb gyfeiriadau. Deb (sgwrs) 11:59, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Chwarae teg. Ond efallai bod angen i ni feddwl am ddyluniad y faner, sy'n dilyn arddull fygythiol, awdudorus enwiki: "Caiff cynnwys heb ei ddyfynnu ei herio, a gellir ei ddileu, o ganlyniad." Dw i'n credu y gallem ni ddod o hyd i rywbeth mwy calonogol. Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 15:25, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Syniad da. Deb (sgwrs) 15:36, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i wedi rhoi cynnig arni. Gweler Nodyn:Dim-ffynonellau. Beth yw dy farn di?
- Mae'r adran "Template documentation" ar enwiki yn dweud:
This template should only be used on articles that have no citations or references at all. Don't add this template to articles that contain even one general reference, bare URL, or citation-containing footnote. A citation is any description of a reliable source that supports any of the article content. The format of the citation and the name of the section heading (e.g., ==External links==) are not what determines whether a link or citation is a source.
- Dw i'n credu y byddai'n ddefnyddiol cael testun cyfatebol ar ein fersiwn ni. Dyma beth rwy'n awgrymu ein bod ni'n ei gael:
Mae'r templed hwn i'w ddefnyddio ar erthyglau nad oes ganddynt unrhyw ddyfyniadau na chyfeiriadau o gwbl. Osgowch ychwanegu'r templed hwn at erthyglau sy'n cynnwys hyd yn oed un cyfeiriad cyffredinol, URL noeth, neu droednodyn sy'n cynnwys dyfyniad. Dyfyniad yw unrhyw ddisgrifiad o ffynhonnell ddibynadwy sy'n cefnogi unrhyw ran o gynnwys yr erthygl.
- (Nid yw brawddeg olaf y fersiwn Saesneg yn glir nac yn arbennig o ddefnyddiol yn fy marn i.) Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 11:48, 26 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i'n meddwl bod yr adran "Dolenni allanol" yn beryglus. I ddechrau, nid yw'n cysylltu'n uniongyrchol ag unrhyw ran benodol o'r erthygl. Felly dyw e ddim yn gyfeiriad go iawn. Fel arfer mae'n cynnwys dolen i wefan bersonol y pwnc, nad yw fel arfer yn cael ei hystyried yn ffynhonnell ddibynadwy. Deb (sgwrs) 12:41, 26 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Mae hynny'n safbwynt rhesymol, a byddaf i'n ei ystyried o ddifrif pan fyddaf i'n golygu yn y dyfodol. Dyna oedd rheswm arall pam nes i awgrymu hepgor llinell olaf y canllaw enwiki.
- Serch hynny, yn "Dolenni allanol" y mae gennym ni fanylion gwefannau swyddogol fel arfer, a lle rydw i wedi arfer rhoi dolenni i ffacsimili a deunyddiau gwreiddiol eraill. Efallai y dylai rhai o'r pethau hyn ymddangos o dan y pennawd "Ffynonellau" neu rywbeth felly. Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 15:09, 26 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Mae e wedi dod ychydig o gymhleth. Dim fel 2002! Deb (sgwrs) 15:11, 26 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Dw i'n meddwl bod yr adran "Dolenni allanol" yn beryglus. I ddechrau, nid yw'n cysylltu'n uniongyrchol ag unrhyw ran benodol o'r erthygl. Felly dyw e ddim yn gyfeiriad go iawn. Fel arfer mae'n cynnwys dolen i wefan bersonol y pwnc, nad yw fel arfer yn cael ei hystyried yn ffynhonnell ddibynadwy. Deb (sgwrs) 12:41, 26 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Syniad da. Deb (sgwrs) 15:36, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Chwarae teg. Ond efallai bod angen i ni feddwl am ddyluniad y faner, sy'n dilyn arddull fygythiol, awdudorus enwiki: "Caiff cynnwys heb ei ddyfynnu ei herio, a gellir ei ddileu, o ganlyniad." Dw i'n credu y gallem ni ddod o hyd i rywbeth mwy calonogol. Craigysgafn (sgwrs) 15:25, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)
- Gadewch i mi egluro ymhellach. Rhaid adolygu'r erthyglau newydd ("Marcio bod y tudalen wedi derbyn ymweliad patrol!) cyn iddyn nhw fynd yn y templed "Erthyglau Newydd". Dydw i ddim yn teimlo y gallaf eu marcio fel rhai wedi'u hadolygu heb gyfeiriadau. Deb (sgwrs) 11:59, 25 Medi 2025 (UTC)